Appeal for trail marker declined

Hello, I appealed this trail marker and it was rejected even on appeal for being a “common pilgrimage route sign with no significance”. I don’t quite understand, as that decision clashes with the criteria clarification l. The trail marker is at a decision point at a crossroads. Why was the appeal rejected?

Martinusweg-Marker Stäudach
Tübingen BW (48.532529,9.089172)
Diese Pilgerwegmarkierung kennzeichnet den Martinusweg, einen Pilgerweg auf den Spuren des heiligen Martin. Der Tübinger Abschnitt gehört zum Regionalweg Zwiefalter-Reutlinger Alb und führt über Kirchentellinsfurt, Pfrondorf, Lustnau, den Österberg und die Altstadt weiter nach Rottenburg.

Die Markierung ist Teil eines dauerhaften Pilgerwegs und dient der Orientierung vor Ort. Laut Niantic sind Trail Marker von Fußwegen gute Wayspots, da sie zur Bewegung und zum Entdecken der Umgebung einladen (siehe Screenshot). Das gelbe Kreuz auf dunkelrotem Grund ist das offizielle Zeichen der regionalen Martinuswege. Der Tübinger Abschnitt führt über Lustnau, Österberg und Altstadt nach Rottenburg. Martinusweg: Martinuswege in Baden-Württemberg - Wegverlauf Offizielle Route: Relation: ‪MWZ 3 Kirchentellinsfurt - Rottenburg‬ (‪19654178‬) | OpenStreetMap

Appeal text:
The nomination is a permanent trail marker for the Martinusweg, an established pilgrimage and long-distance walking route. The marker is located at a junction and serves as a navigational waypoint for people following the route. This makes it a strong Wayspot candidate under the exploration and exercise criteria: it actively supports hiking and pilgrimage by guiding walkers along a designated route and marks a meaningful point along that route rather than being a generic road sign. The Martinusweg is an officially documented pilgrimage route and the nominated marker is part of its physical waymarking system. It is safely accessible on foot from the adjacent path. Official route information: https://dekanat-rottenburg.drs.de/dekanat/pilgerwege-im-dekanat/martinusweg.html⁠ Route mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/19654178⁠

Thanks for the appeal, Wayfinder! The nomination in question does not meet the Wayfarer criteria, as it is a common pilgrimage route sign with no significance. If this assessment is not accurate, please resubmit the nomination with additional context. We recommend you review the Wayspot Criteria and Forum Criteria Discussions Library sections before submitting your next Wayspot contribution: Wayfarer — Niantic Technical Support and Help Center and Forum Criteria Discussions Library — Wayfarer Help Center

Strange, there is no such thing as a common pilgrimage route. The appeal reviewer made a serious mistake in my opinion.

I do hope that forum staff will see this message and correct this error.

(I didn’t check the route if it exists as mentioned in your appeal, as this wasn’t the reason for rejecting it)

There actually are “common pilgrimage routes”, though this isn’t the right part of the world for either of the two I’m familiar with. (One is in France and Spain, the other is in California.) They’re basically just marked hiking trails or roadway walking routes that happen to exist for religious reasons.

Sure, there are many pilgrimage routes in Europe, the most famous one being the one to Santiago de Compostella. But I would never consider these as common, not unless we would consider every trail just a common trail.

Do you have a link for the trail that goes through here?

It’s mapped on Waymarkedtrails

Is that a website with user-submitted trails, or equivalent to https://ldwa.org.uk/ ?

Also, that is a screenshot not a URL, making it hard to validate.

Waymarkedtrails:

OSM:

I found this, which feels like an official website, and zooming in on this section of the trail does indeed show it heading along this urban street :slight_smile:

I see the wayspot at 48.532399, 9.088835

Looking at the title, this was a different trail marker (but for the same trail)

Yes, that is a trail marker on the other side of the crossroads.