Hi all,
So I’m sure you’re all sick of seeing this now, but I’m frustrated. Even after providing evidence of this Bird screen being a bird screen, the appeal staff still reject it. Clearly didn’t even bother looking at the supporting information.
Is there anything else I could possibly do? I’ll fully give up if not, which is frustrating as it should definitely be eligible no? I mean, a bird viewing screen in a nature reserve..
Thanks all.
To be fair they will have read it.
You do seem to have good evidence In the submission - did it fall foul of auto rejection?
As a UK reviewer I would welcome the chance to review this and assess it. It is becoming more common as places try to become more sustainable ( a very good thing) and as a result they do not fit with the more expensive and intrusive structures.
It should be about their function. Not what they are made of.
I would probably have directed more in my appeal statement rather than its all there. But I have no proof that writing an essay or a few words works best 
Maybe The idea of winter photo so that the screen stands out more with less green around it = maybe even a snow picture. 
Yeah, the auto reject got it. Every angle/ photo I have done just doesn’t get past it. Though that being said, it is frustrating that the appeal staff seem to constantly also reject eligible submissions.
Ill stop being impatientand try during the winter like suggested here and before! (Thank you!)
