I have a question regarding bug hotels, while reviewing them, it is usually easy to confirm that there is no reason to reject them (the 4 rejection criteria). However I’m having a hard time to tick one of the boxes in the 3 acceptance criteria. I usually have 3 “no’s” in this part. Does this mean that the effect is that I am not accepting these nominations?
I don’t mind if that is the conclusion, just curious.
I really don’t know if they should be rejected, though as they appear more often, I may consider the non-distinct button.
For now, I see them occasionally in real life, but they are mass produced. So it would probably not take long before you see them everywhere.
For now, I still consider them distinct and permanent.
But is it something to explore, exercise, or socialise, no not really (at least to me).
I am seeing more and more of the standard mass produced ones, ones that are really sold for you to have in your garden.
Most of them look brand new with a nail just about holding them to a tree that is ideally suited to be a couch stop / gym for several houses.
These I Reject as Not Distinct, would report as Abuse but no evidence.
The larger, normally hand made ones found in parks etc, if it looks official I would Accept as “Explore” as in “Exploring Nature”.
They look like the ones they give out to every person for free when you buy a house in a new estate here
