# Feature idea: New voting option: Low Quality Object

**URL:** <https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/feature-idea-new-voting-option-low-quality-object/15285>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [May 22, 2024, 5:23pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/feature-idea-new-voting-option-low-quality-object/15285 "2024-05-22T17:23:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 42

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cyndiepooh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/96bed5/32.png) [@cyndiepooh](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/cyndiepooh)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2024, 10:35pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/feature-idea-new-voting-option-low-quality-object/15285/42 "2024-05-22T22:35:30Z")

</div>

On the old forum we were told that the intended use of that text box is NOT as “Other Rejection Criteria” but I can’t link that now.

We were also told to pick one of the first four questions to reject a nomination. I choose the closest one. That is not lying.

> [@AMA - November 2023](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/ama-november-2023/125/5):
>
> If you believe that a nomination should not be on the map, make sure you review the nomination and thumbs down Safe, Appropriate, Accuracy, or Permanent and Distinct to have your review reflect a rejection.

I do like the idea of having to go through a couple of clicks to say that something “Doesn’t Meet Criteria,” and I do want that checkbox to be made available and added to the review.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/feature-idea-new-voting-option-low-quality-object/15285)._
