# How to Review?

**URL:** <https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/how-to-review/75026>\
**Category:** Review Support\
**Created:** [February 15, 2025, 11:57am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/how-to-review/75026 "2025-02-15T11:57:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cyndiepooh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/96bed5/32.png) [@cyndiepooh](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/cyndiepooh)\
**Post date:** [February 15, 2025, 1:14pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/how-to-review/75026/5 "2025-02-15T13:14:01Z")

</div>

Just use your best judgment. For most nominations on trails, I mark the social section “I don’t know” and exercise and exploration as 👍

FYI this clarification was made about how to reject nominations in this new review flow;

> [@AMA - November 2023](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/ama-november-2023/125/5):
>
> If you believe that a nomination should not be on the map, make sure you review the nomination and thumbs down Safe, Appropriate, Accuracy, or Permanent and Distinct to have your review reflect a rejection.

So it appears that even marking all three as 👎 is not a rejection. But that has not been stated anywhere.

We can’t just mark something as not meeting criteria, but we can say that it is not “Distinct” in its environment, which I use often for things like lamp posts which are generic infrastructure and should not have been submitted.

> [@Maxl123456789v](#):
>
> I would generally accept this.

It looks like something I would accept, too.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/how-to-review/75026)._