# Image review - invalid Wayspot

**URL:** <https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/image-review-invalid-wayspot/18815>\
**Category:** Review Support\
**Created:** [June 5, 2024, 1:55pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/image-review-invalid-wayspot/18815 "2024-06-05T13:55:51Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zrickxy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a698b9/32.png) [@zrickxy](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/zrickxy)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2024, 1:55pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/image-review-invalid-wayspot/18815/1 "2024-06-05T13:55:51Z")

</div>

![Screenshot_20240605-153247_Chrome](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/2X/2/2ad40f0c16e09e69c9ce4d263b6bfc673804fabb.jpeg)  
This is image shows that the object isn’t publicly accessible. While reviewing I’ve also seen a lot of images that clearly show that the Wayspot in question doesn’t exist anymore. So it would be an advantage to have the option to report a Wayspot as invalid while reviewing images.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zrickxy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a698b9/32.png) [@zrickxy](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/zrickxy)\
**Post date:** [June 5, 2024, 2:02pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/image-review-invalid-wayspot/18815/2 "2024-06-05T14:02:19Z")

</div>

I think a lot of explorers upload images that prove that a Wayspot doesn’t meet the criteria anymore in the hope that it will be removed from the database 🤔