Hey,
I appealed this nomination because I don’t think the reviewers did a good job on this one. I just got the following appeal back, and it was rejected for a part of the description. Look at screenshots provided.
The problem is, several (almost 10+) appeals had almost the same description since I think this is how you can explain this the best way and these were all approved.
An example of a almost identical wayspot approved on appeal with same description and little different appeal text.
Could someone clarify why this specific part of the description was rejected on appeal, and why it was not rejected by my other appeals, if that was the case I would have changed the description way earlier.
If the description is indeed ineligible I would have to replace the description on alot of wayspots ( I can/will change if necessary ofcours), but I was hoping to get clarification first.
Thanks.