# Inconsistent appeal decision **URL:** \ **Category:** Nomination Support\ **Created:** [August 11, 2025, 10:42am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/inconsistent-appeal-decision/106297 "2025-08-11T10:42:50Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 2\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![AMG7070](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f4b2a3/32.png) [@AMG7070](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/AMG7070)\ **Post date:** [August 11, 2025, 10:42am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/inconsistent-appeal-decision/106297/1 "2025-08-11T10:42:50Z")
![Screenshot_20250811_123524_Samsung Internet](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/b/f/bf746029d1583b9bf7beb686804b1a7d8e3c26f8.jpeg) ![Screenshot_20250811_123543_Samsung Internet](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/3/6/36a6a6d61280f132d5928e37a9471143c51e4a33.jpeg) ![Screenshot_20250811_123538_Samsung Internet](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/f/c/fcc25aed70b8d1189f07554989142041fc373587.jpeg) Hey, I appealed this nomination because I don’t think the reviewers did a good job on this one. I just got the following appeal back, and it was rejected for a part of the description. Look at screenshots provided. The problem is, several (almost 10+) appeals had almost the same description since I think this is how you can explain this the best way and these were all approved. An example of a almost identical wayspot approved on appeal with same description and little different appeal text. ![Screenshot_20250811_124345_Samsung Internet](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/6/4/649eeb745e5f90c6c40cfbd1ed2d93f73dd1b111.jpeg) ![Screenshot_20250811_124353_Samsung Internet](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/9/e/9e9dda63b103fbafcda55d006132d93a0c14b554.jpeg) Could someone clarify why this specific part of the description was rejected on appeal, and why it was not rejected by my other appeals, if that was the case I would have changed the description way earlier. If the description is indeed ineligible I would have to replace the description on alot of wayspots ( I can/will change if necessary ofcours), but I was hoping to get clarification first. Thanks. ---
**Author:** ![AMG7070](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f4b2a3/32.png) [@AMG7070](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/AMG7070)\ **Post date:** [August 11, 2025, 12:21pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/inconsistent-appeal-decision/106297/2 "2025-08-11T12:21:30Z")
The wayspot in question here has just been accepted. A thank you for the staff for taking another look🤗