That company does have other social endeavors, not just preventing social isolation, my main point was to find such social endeavors and emphasize which ever your locals would resonate with.
That rejection reason is for “Temporary or not Distinct.” Staff have said that “not Distinct” is a correct rejection for something that is mass produced.
This appears to be something that would have been mass produced and posted in multiple locations.
I wouldn’t get too hung up on that, since that reply was completely unrelated to what I was asking and thus it was an answer based on a misunderstanding.
If we consider “mass produced” object option than, every local infopoints are not eligible
How so? An advertisement would be printed up and posted many places. An information board such as the one that was accepted is a permanent structure where folks come to find the information they need.
(Edit: note that Aaron’s message was about “ineligible mass produced objects.” He did not say that every mass produced object is ineligble. Trail markers are an example of something that may be mass produced but are eligible.)
That’s a bit of hyperbole. Part of the rationale is that if it otherwise may meet criteria, it doesn’t fall under “mass produced.”
Playgrounds, trail markers, benches can all be seen as “mass produced” and benches even have a full clarification about how they don’t fall under that when unique or otherwise seen as promoting socializing, exercise, or exploration.