I have nominated pokestop for one department outside a hospital and accepted while an other department with same criteria not accepted!!
Many nominated pokestop rejected without telling the exact reason
I have nominated pokestop for one department outside a hospital and accepted while an other department with same criteria not accepted!!
Many nominated pokestop rejected without telling the exact reason
Welcome to the forum!
If you would like us to try to help you interpret the rejection reason(s) you can leave screenshots of the nomination.
Personally I don’t see how either meets criteria.
Why would they be a great place to socialise, exercise or explore?
I’m guessing that not many reviewers in Oman have been properly educated on Wayfarer criteria. The maintenance department should never have been accepted.
I am happy to see that there are active Wayfinders in Oman. Let us know how we can help get better education to the community.
Still it remain your own guess
AI can tell you any thing now no need to guess
I have visited many famous European cities and saw many funny pokestop
Yes in my country difficult to find things to be a pokestops but still will keep trying
AI can tell you anything, even lies sometimes
Why is is a Guess? Please inform us why any of these meet the main criteria as a great place to socialise, exercise or explore? No need for guesses…
Never use what you have seen in game as confirmation that they are eligible. Things slip through, criteria changes.
All we have at the moment is that it is a location big enough to have an hospital with several departments. I am pretty sure if you pass the location details then people here will be able to give you suggestions that don’t run the risk of being reported and removed.
“No need to guess” was the answer for "I’m guessing that not many reviewers in Oman have been properly educated on Wayfarer criteria. "
Which (the guess) was rude and not needed.
Thanks for clearing that up, would not state it as rude, maybe a slightly clumsy way of wording it but with the previous comments on this thread I can clearly see why there would be an assumption of what was said.
It still does not answer the rest of my post…