# Removal rejection

**URL:** <https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028>\
**Category:** Wayspot Appeals\
**Created:** [October 30, 2026, 7:06am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028 "2026-10-30T07:06:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pokemaster4u2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d07c76/32.png) [@pokemaster4u2](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/pokemaster4u2)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 7:06am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/1 "2026-10-30T07:06:41Z")

</div>

When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:

- Wayspot Title: Maine’s Frogs Informational Sign
- Location _(lat/lon)_: 44.289752, -69.999912
- 

Also: Maine’s Deer Informational Sign (44.289700, -70.000097)

 ![IMG_3791](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/b/5/b50184173aad30c30e34e15a7958708d8e052396.jpeg)

See also to see that it is on private propery : [Nevermind thanks - #27 by pokemaster4u2](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/nevermind-thanks/117927/27)

See the pictures the submitter took, they show these wayspots were misplaced

> [@Nevermind thanks](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/nevermind-thanks/117927/29):
>
> The signs were put up in the summer of this year, which makes sense for the google earth part, and the surrounding overgrowth was also cut back this summer and has since grown back. I can provide some images I took after work as I decided I’d rather not deal with this and get things settled. Dark so photos aren’t the best but they are here in the cul-de-sac with surrounding area as proof.

To summarise:  
Both wayspots were misplaced, both are homemade signs, and the real location is at SFPRP

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatepWorld95](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@MatepWorld95](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/MatepWorld95)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:22pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/2 "2026-10-30T16:22:04Z")

</div>

It is not homemade! These were put up I literally went to the location to show you they were there with images. They are in the cul-de-sac not on anyones private property. They are there and are legit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![00witsd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/0/2acd7d/32.png) [@00witsd](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/00witsd)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:30pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/3 "2026-10-30T16:30:01Z")

</div>

> [@pokemaster4u2](#):
>
> - 44.289752, -69.999912

“Maine’s Deer” is right on the edge of the tarmac. It’s pinned to a wide tree, at least 20cm in diameter.

There are absolutely no trees large enough in that spot:

 ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/b/b/bb90b407590c5758d4fb1db9e7d3e37f6c862014.jpeg)

I don’t know what the evidence for it being SFPRP is, as I can’t see where it _should_ be, but it is definitely misplaced.

“Maine’s Frogs” is harder to be sure about, but it does seem very questionable that an official sign has been placed here.

@MatepWorld95 could you repost the photos you took / link us back to that thread?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatepWorld95](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@MatepWorld95](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/MatepWorld95)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:31pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/4 "2026-10-30T16:31:39Z")

</div>

Photo’s for the signs

> [@Nevermind thanks](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/nevermind-thanks/117927/29):
>
> The signs were put up in the summer of this year, which makes sense for the google earth part, and the surrounding overgrowth was also cut back this summer and has since grown back. I can provide some images I took after work as I decided I’d rather not deal with this and get things settled. Dark so photos aren’t the best but they are here in the cul-de-sac with surrounding area as proof.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![00witsd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/0/2acd7d/32.png) [@00witsd](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/00witsd)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:36pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/5 "2026-10-30T16:36:17Z")

</div>

Okay, to be blunt, those photos are not very convincing. Nothing else is included and the ground looks different for starters.

I do appreciate that the StreetView there is a year out of date, but unless something has managed to carve a large, curved line in the road in that time…

I’m not quite in full conspiracy mode, but there’s just enough that doesn’t add up here. 🤷‍♂️

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatepWorld95](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@MatepWorld95](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/MatepWorld95)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:37pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/6 "2026-10-30T16:37:34Z")

</div>

The scrape was from a snow plow this winter… and the ground is different as the trees were cut back

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatepWorld95](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@MatepWorld95](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/MatepWorld95)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:39pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/7 "2026-10-30T16:39:00Z")

</div>

Also in the background of the first photo you can see the outline of a barn in the distance which is there if you go overhead view on maps

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![00witsd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/0/2acd7d/32.png) [@00witsd](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/00witsd)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:40pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/8 "2026-10-30T16:40:25Z")

</div>

Well, I honestly don’t know. But I think it’s safe to say that nothing has been conclusively proven.

If you live nearby, maybe a very short video doing a 360º turn would shut everyone up? 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatepWorld95](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@MatepWorld95](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/MatepWorld95)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 4:51pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/9 "2026-10-30T16:51:59Z")

</div>

I can see if I swing by later, but if I do that I would like that to be the last of it, no more things needed because the signs are there and I’m getting kinda tired of this. It’s no ones fault you all are just trying to make the community better, but I know that they are here. And they aren’t on private property

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MatepWorld95](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/8c91f0/32.png) [@MatepWorld95](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/MatepWorld95)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 5:38pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/10 "2026-10-30T17:38:35Z")

</div>

Got the 360º video, school just let out so I was able to get over there quickly before practice. But, it’s not letting me put the video up. I created a link to another website so it’s viewable. [2202](https://go.screenpal.com/watch/cO6vbgnydz8) The first sign is towards the left of where the overgrowth is, and the 2nd sign is straight ahead at the very end of the cul-de-sac. You might have to slow it down to see that one, it kind of blends in

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![salixsorbus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9fc348/32.png) [@salixsorbus](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/salixsorbus)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 6:22pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/11 "2026-10-30T18:22:48Z")

</div>

That is definitely a video and appears to be of that cul-de-sac. I think it would have been very helpful to include a close-up of the signs, as it is **very** hard to determine that the far-off white things in that video are the signs that were the wayspots.

This site doesn’t host videos, as you found, so posting it elsewhere and linking is absolutely correct.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pokemaster4u2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d07c76/32.png) [@pokemaster4u2](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/pokemaster4u2)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 9:45pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/12 "2026-10-30T21:45:02Z")

</div>

I’ll leave it to staff to decide, I did notice that the location has now been adjusted (it looks more accurate, but there are currently two wayspots in one cell, and if placed correctly from the start, there would only be one).

 ![maine](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/b/8/b894b639b04d3d77ff3ba40d9041c05e1d157313.jpeg)

This is what the property lines are according to parcel map:

 ![mayflower](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/4/0/40bef60474ad773a757ae9b3d5b0237ddd0fa805.jpeg)

These are the pictures of the wayspot (I do consider these homemade, don’t intend to suggest that these were placed by the person nominating this wayspot)

 ![maines deer](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/c/0/c037aba67243c6e69ef6a1a6cdb2a612c8e329b0.jpeg)  
 ![maines frog](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/9/1/91f98415c5a32feb60bc97ef30e1e6d1e49d5b4e.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![00witsd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/0/2acd7d/32.png) [@00witsd](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/00witsd)\
**Post date:** [October 30, 2026, 10:57pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/removal-rejection/118028/13 "2026-10-30T22:57:08Z")

</div>

> [@pokemaster4u2](#):
>
> This is what the property lines are according to parcel map:

That would seem to imply that the crescent-shaped area is not SFPRP?

Or am I misreading it?
