# Review Pokestop at Isolated Location

**URL:** <https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/review-pokestop-at-isolated-location/55661>\
**Category:** Review Support\
**Created:** [October 25, 2024, 8:35am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/review-pokestop-at-isolated-location/55661 "2024-10-25T08:35:07Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HinduLoveGods](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/e95f7d/32.png) [@HinduLoveGods](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/HinduLoveGods)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2024, 8:35am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/review-pokestop-at-isolated-location/55661/1 "2024-10-25T08:35:07Z")

</div>

I am seeking some guidance on how to review a nomination that is located at an isolated location. This nomination is for the recreational area at a mining workforce camp. The submitted photo shows a patch of red dirt and fails to show (in my opinion) a designated recreational area. Normally I would reject the nomination on this basis. Having said that, the workers camp is in the middle of nowhere and is located nearly 80km away from the nearest townsite. Due to the isolated location, workers fly in / fly out and are restricted to the campsite during their two week shift. The approval of a wayspot at this location (where no wayspots currently exist) would at least support gameplay.

 ![IMG_0415](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/2/5/2577b1663df9d6efd36207886be7655a66bd02fb.jpeg)  
 ![IMG_0416](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/c/3/c39b64e9d8e4265dd864f90d82b45c3fbb6ab851.jpeg)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![azerlete](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/f9ae1b/32.png) [@azerlete](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/azerlete)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2024, 2:23am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/review-pokestop-at-isolated-location/55661/2 "2024-11-07T02:23:58Z")

</div>

I can see a table and benches if I squint.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![paulingzubat](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/user_avatar/community.wayfarer.scopely.com/paulingzubat/32/10536_2.png) [@paulingzubat](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/paulingzubat)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2024, 2:50am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/review-pokestop-at-isolated-location/55661/3 "2024-11-07T02:50:20Z")

</div>

Hello!

Refer to this clarification:

> [@Parks & Outdoor Recreation](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/parks-outdoor-recreation/12466/1):
>
> A nomination can be made for a park even if a park does not have a physical sign but is clearly a park. If there is an obvious entrance or focal point, that would be a good location to place the pin, but equally the middle of the park may be suitable. The supporting photo and text should provide evidence that the location is intended to be used as a park or recreational area.

> [@Picnic Areas](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/picnic-areas/12468):
>
> Picnic areas are great places to be social! Note that a picnic area with a group of tables constitutes one nomination. However, not all picnic areas are eligible across the board. For example, a picnic table on single-family private residential property should not be accepted. [image] +1 Picnic areas and tables that appear to be permanent, even if not bolted to the ground like those above, are great places for socialization.

If you feel that this photo is sufficient as the focal point of recreational area, I’d lean favorably. You seem convinced that this IS a rec area for starters.

As for isolated/restricted locations, the tooltip under Appropriate shows guidance as well as the articles below.

> [@Private Residences, Farmland & K-12](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/private-residences-farmland-k-12/12462):
>
> Single-family private residential properties (SFPRP), farms, and K-12 (schools or facilities primarily focused for persons under 18 years of age) are ineligible. This includes the outer facing facade, fence of these locations, and property boundaries. Objects in or upon apartment blocks, gated communities, or their shared spaces may be eligible assuming they otherwise meet criteria and are intended to be accessed by a community, even if not everyone. Communal spaces have the potential to be eli…

> [@Military Bases](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/military-bases/12483):
>
> Nominations of or within Military bases are generally ineligible. However, if the nomination is of a park or public area that is open to the residents of the base or the general public in the military base it will meet our eligibility criteria. +1 This picnic area which meets the socialization criteria is eligible. It’s located in the residential part of the base and accessible by military personnel and their families. :+1:The out of commission helicopter has 2 informatio…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![7heClown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/7/bbce88/32.png) [@7heClown](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/7heClown)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2024, 3:41am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/review-pokestop-at-isolated-location/55661/4 "2024-11-07T03:41:56Z")

</div>

I actually remember voting on this one. I think I denied it due to low quality photo since it was difficult to see the rest area in question with out zooming in / squinting.
