The end of interesting and quality nominations?

[TrungLatias]

Hey, so I want to provide one quick insight on my opinion.

@DenialN1

90% of playgrounds are empty.

Still a playground, still serve its purpose. I don’t see what’s wrong.

@DenialN1

Every apartment building has one. They are monotonous and boring.

Does not change the fact playground is still a GREAT place for socializing and a great place for children to exercise.

@DenialN1

In theory, the playgrounds have a mission of socialization, but in reality they do not fulfill it

I disagree again, parents actively seek out this specfic location called playground to drop children nearby.

@DenialN1

In reality, they are also empty.

Does not change the fact it is a sport ground. Does not change the fact it is a great place to exercise.

@DenialN1

Wayfarer’s mission is to create the most interesting, family-friendly, and accurate representation of the real-world.

If playground and sport field is not interesting, is not a great place for people to hang out, then I failed to see your whole point because you are completely going off Wayfarer criteria.

@ScopelyExpTintino

Playgrounds meet the criteria for exercise, exploration, and socialization, and as long as they are not located on single-family private residential property or K-12 schools can be considered eligible.

@DenialN1

Another example is a bus stop. Ours looks similar to this …

It is another topic and does not in anyway related to the three you are talking about. It is not eligible for a wayspot.

@DenialN1

They’re a constant source of communication and networking for tons of people, but there’s nothing unique or interesting about them.

You don’t go Bus Stop to socialize, you don’t go Bus stop to exercise.
You go to Playground to exercise as a kid, or socialize with other parent in that area.

I recommend you read the Wayfarer criteria and Wayfarer Criteria Clarification.