# This is clearly not a duplicate **URL:** \ **Category:** Nomination Support\ **Created:** [January 16, 2025, 7:32am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/this-is-clearly-not-a-duplicate/69891 "2025-01-16T07:32:14Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 3\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![OhMaikGosh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/b9bd4f/32.png) [@OhMaikGosh](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/OhMaikGosh)\ **Post date:** [January 16, 2025, 7:32am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/this-is-clearly-not-a-duplicate/69891/1 "2025-01-16T07:32:14Z")
I’m having several issues with a recently built park and I’m stating to feel a little bit frustrated… The park is still not visible in Google Maps, but it is visible in other platforms and several 360 photos I have taken. All my nominations are getting rejected by the community even if I provide enough supporting information. After being rejected as “Mismatching Location” I have appealed them and until now they have been accepted. In my last appeal someone has decided that my nomination is a duplicate on another wayspot. This is my nomination: ![image](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/a/7/a7811941b0cd668273d41d94243b43e919656258.jpeg) Title: Zona de Calistenia en Serralta Description: Zona de calistenia municipal en el Parque Serralta. Supplemental Info: Las zonas de calistenia fomentan la socialización y el ejercicio. El parque Serralta es de reciente construcción, en la imagen satélite no se aprecia correctamente, pero hay fotos 360 de la zona. Lo que permite ubicarlo correctamente. Muchas gracias With this info I got it rejected as “Mismatching Location”, like all the nominations of this new park. But I have uploaded a 360 photo where it can be seen clearly. I appealed this nomination (I like having all my profile with accepted nominations) giving more detailed info that I’m not able to find now. However, I will provide it here. This is the park seen with Google Maps and the nominated location: ![Captura de pantalla 2025-01-16 a las 8.07.52](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/9/c/9c398077e6cd92b46daa64dad92acfaca24ec10d.jpeg) This is the park’s satellital view using another provider: ![Captura de pantalla 2025-01-16 a las 8.09.51](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/d/3/d382996a8dcc1e9ed551fc632f3b86629cdafcaa.jpeg) This is the 360 photo I took with the nomination location marker: ![Captura de pantalla 2025-01-16 a las 8.15.48](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/3/f/3f6c3ea125dc2af329845c23d5382ed325641e08.png) Until this point is to prove that the nomination exists and that it should have been accepted in the first place. However, it got rejected and I appealed. My surprise now is that it has been reject as a duplicate of another accepted wayspot: ![Captura de pantalla 2025-01-16 a las 8.18.05](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/b/f/bfe188ac151fccac84ab83bf439e6b13b7e44c9a.png) In the message it says that is the same Calisthenics area of the following nomination: ![Captura de pantalla 2025-01-16 a las 8.17.55](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/2/d/2d773bd70858696409bee7731c265697c5adffec.png) It is clearly not the case, since this accepted wayspot is a Parkour area close to the calisthenics one. It can be clearly seen in the 360 photo I provided to during the appeal process: > **[Google Maps](https://maps.app.goo.gl/UTyhaj3uYEB5odb46)** > > Explore a place through a 360° photo. The calisthenics area has a red ground, the parkour area has a green ground. They even have different information panels: ![Captura de pantalla 2025-01-16 a las 8.24.17](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/f/2/f2eea3681faf4d8b1d43703c5f49e3d66b9db53e.jpeg) Please consider deduplicating this nomination. Different areas in the same park are allowed per Wayfarer criteria and I think these are completely different. I feel like all my job has been thrown to the bin… I have even used an appeal… and I think this should have been accepted. If an Ambassador finds this information useful I would like some from the Wayfarer Team to review it… Thanks ---
**Author:** ![hankwolfman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/7feea3/32.png) [@hankwolfman](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/hankwolfman)\ **Post date:** [January 16, 2025, 12:26pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/this-is-clearly-not-a-duplicate/69891/2 "2025-01-16T12:26:13Z")
“Zona de Calistenia en Serralta” is already in the database as a wayspot, as can be seen in the Geospatial Browser: ![Screenshot_20250116-122311](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/1/7/1780836a592b1449674f10fdcee248caa494ca5a.jpeg) ---
**Author:** ![OhMaikGosh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/b9bd4f/32.png) [@OhMaikGosh](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/OhMaikGosh)\ **Post date:** [January 16, 2025, 12:27pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/this-is-clearly-not-a-duplicate/69891/3 "2025-01-16T12:27:06Z")
Yes, someone took a look to it and accepted my appeal. Thanks