# US Bike trailmarker **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [August 8, 2026, 6:18pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/us-bike-trailmarker/115839 "2026-08-08T18:18:32Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 6
**Author:** ![pokemaster4u2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d07c76/32.png) [@pokemaster4u2](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/pokemaster4u2)\ **Post date:** [August 8, 2026, 7:16pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/us-bike-trailmarker/115839/6 "2026-08-08T19:16:03Z")
I never received a direct response from Scopely, but I actually believed most bike route markers should be allowed. In The Netherlands we have the same kind of generic sings that @SlimboyFat71 mentioned, and we also have just directional bike markers to get to the surrounding cities. And we also have signs, just for leisure purpose, all of those are considered ineligble. Only official routes are considered eligible. They have not replied to me, but did in several other cases, they have made it clear it should be an official route. In my view, this is more or less the same, so I should treat it the same. > [@Dutch biking trails](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/dutch-biking-trails/100661): > > In my view the Wayfarer staff have taken a completely wrong position regarding Dutch biking trails. Biking is very important in The Netherlands, we have more bikes than people. The government has even decided to assign official trail markers for recreational purposes. Many wayspots have been submitted, and in my view completely justified, as these are signs that have, by law, the purpose to mark recreational bike trails. There are also many signs, again by law, to mark infrastructure direction… --- _[View the full topic](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/us-bike-trailmarker/115839)._