# Wayspot Appeal - Review Request **URL:** \ **Category:** Wayspot Appeals\ **Tags:** appeal-removed-poi\ **Created:** [October 17, 2026, 3:17pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/wayspot-appeal-review-request/117667 "2026-10-17T15:17:24Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 6\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![StarlightZxy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/3be4f8/32.png) [@StarlightZxy](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/StarlightZxy)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 3:17pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/wayspot-appeal-review-request/117667/1 "2026-10-17T15:17:24Z")
Request under review. Thank you. ---
**Author:** ![ChicagoRay312](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e19b73/32.png) [@ChicagoRay312](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/ChicagoRay312)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 3:27pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/wayspot-appeal-review-request/117667/2 "2026-10-17T15:27:17Z")
> [@StarlightZxy](#): > > This artistic project is supported by the local municipality and sponsorship. Do you have a source to back this up? If I was reviewing this, I would think it’s just an entryway sign. ---
**Author:** ![GeneralSecura](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/eada6e/32.png) [@GeneralSecura](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/GeneralSecura)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 4:07pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/wayspot-appeal-review-request/117667/3 "2026-10-17T16:07:24Z")
You’re just straight-up lying about the second one. That’s just a sign that lists the businesses that are located there. Nothing artistic about it. You can dress it up in as many fancy words as you like, but a spade is still a spade. And the first one just seems like business signage as well. Not particularly interesting. It’s also not “accessible from the sidewalk underneath” when it’s smack dab in the middle of the roof of the building. ---
**Author:** ![00witsd](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/0/2acd7d/32.png) [@00witsd](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/00witsd)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 6:20pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/wayspot-appeal-review-request/117667/4 "2026-10-17T18:20:10Z")
Yeah, I have to agree. It looks like the removal request was legitimate. The intentions of the reporter _might_ be unpleasant, but unless I’m missing something, neither of these should have been accepted in the first place. ---
**Author:** ![pokemaster4u2](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d07c76/32.png) [@pokemaster4u2](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/pokemaster4u2)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 6:24pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/wayspot-appeal-review-request/117667/5 "2026-10-17T18:24:07Z")
It is also not possible to remove wayspots, you can only request a removal, and Scopely staff decides if a wayspot is removed. Anyone can request the removal, but unless a player tells you he/she requested the removal nobody knows the identity of the person requesting the removal. In my opinion both removals were correct. ---
**Author:** ![cyndiepooh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/96bed5/32.png) [@cyndiepooh](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/cyndiepooh)\ **Post date:** [October 17, 2026, 6:31pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/wayspot-appeal-review-request/117667/6 "2026-10-17T18:31:30Z")
> [@StarlightZxy](#): > > Removed for the SECOND TIME on Friday, October 16, 2026, at 8:00 PM. The first version (“Installation Architecturale : Le Cube de Bulle”) was previously removed on Wednesday, September 9, 2026. I first read this as the Wayspot was removed and reinstated. But I believe that you actually mean that this was a new submission of the same Wayspot that had been removed. Resubmitting a Wayspot that has been deemed ineligible and removed by Wayfarer staff can bring sanctions against your account. Do not resubmit if this appeal for reinstatement is denied.