# What is the best way to prove a location for edit inside building?

**URL:** <https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-is-the-best-way-to-prove-a-location-for-edit-inside-building/63503>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [December 5, 2024, 8:12pm UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-is-the-best-way-to-prove-a-location-for-edit-inside-building/63503 "2024-12-05T20:12:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elijustrying](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/user_avatar/community.wayfarer.scopely.com/elijustrying/32/25162_2.png) [@elijustrying](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/elijustrying)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2024, 7:57am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-is-the-best-way-to-prove-a-location-for-edit-inside-building/63503/10 "2024-12-06T07:57:49Z")

</div>

An issue with the splats is that it currently shows user name so potentially could be interpreted as submitter identifiable. Thus at the moment they are not recommended for submissions.

> [@Leveling Up Your Appeals and Reports - Discussion](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/leveling-up-your-appeals-and-reports-discussion/48630/5):
>
> Thanks for sharing the video and great idea on the nomination supporting statement, this is definitely where we’re heading to. But we’re not pushing for that just yet as currently Scaniverse splats (even unlisted) are associated with the user profile. As submissions are supposed to be anonymous we cannot allow reviewers to be influenced by the submitter’s identity and the submitter to divulge it.

So if you do share the splat link in the supplementary there is a risk it could be interpreted like this.  
There was a similar issue with photospheres.

---

_[View the full topic](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-is-the-best-way-to-prove-a-location-for-edit-inside-building/63503)._