# What’s a good % on nominations reviewed **URL:** \ **Category:** General Discussion\ **Created:** [July 30, 2026, 12:25am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507 "2026-07-30T00:25:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 11\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![thehounds21](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ebca7d/32.png) [@thehounds21](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/thehounds21)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 12:25am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/1 "2026-07-30T00:25:29Z")
I currently have 1878 total 1364 approved 28 rejected 33 duplicate Which is about 75.7% ---
**Author:** ![jojenreed64](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/6de8d8/32.png) [@jojenreed64](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/jojenreed64)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 12:47am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/2 "2026-07-30T00:47:02Z")
Welcome! Are these the numbers of reviews you have done? Or the number of agreements earned? In both cases, 1364 approvals seems rather high when compared to only 28 rejections. ---
**Author:** ![thehounds21](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ebca7d/32.png) [@thehounds21](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/thehounds21)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 1:00am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/3 "2026-07-30T01:00:53Z")
![IMG_2486](https://us1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/original/3X/1/8/1882271bea1596145c36277e1ae4f5e3292a7e3c.png) It’s this thing. I just want a general percentage to aim for ---
**Author:** ![elijustrying](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/user_avatar/community.wayfarer.scopely.com/elijustrying/32/25162_2.png) [@elijustrying](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/elijustrying)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 1:12am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/4 "2026-07-30T01:12:12Z")
Hello and welcome @thehounds21 It’s an interesting question that you have asked. And there is no set answer as everyone will see a different stream of nominations and will use skips in different ways. rReflecting on those numbers do you feel that the number of nominations you have reviewed were poor and worthy of rejection is about right? I am based in the UK and I would expect to come across far more instances of nominations where I would be voting to reject because they just don’t meet criteria. Perhaps you are fortunate and lve somewhere where that isn’t the case. Are you asking because you are curious about your own numbers? ---
**Author:** ![thehounds21](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ebca7d/32.png) [@thehounds21](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/thehounds21)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 1:17am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/5 "2026-07-30T01:17:56Z")
I was more just curious if my agreement percentage was good. I think I started off pretty low. I just review between sets at the gym ---
**Author:** ![elijustrying](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/user_avatar/community.wayfarer.scopely.com/elijustrying/32/25162_2.png) [@elijustrying](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/elijustrying)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 1:29am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/6 "2026-07-30T01:29:17Z")
I personally don’t concern myself with targets. And in many respects the total percentage of when you agreed is not that vital. There is always a delay as it takes time after you have voted for the nomination to reach a conclusion and it to clock up as an agreement. What is often more indicative of a persons voting behaviour is the balance between voting to accept or reject. Your number of agreed rejects seems very low.. is it rare for you to find nominations that don’t meet criteria? ---
**Author:** ![thehounds21](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ebca7d/32.png) [@thehounds21](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/thehounds21)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 1:31am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/7 "2026-07-30T01:31:54Z")
I mainly get churches, trail markers, art work and sports fields/courts. But until recently I was using the skip button as a reject button ---
**Author:** ![elijustrying](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/user_avatar/community.wayfarer.scopely.com/elijustrying/32/25162_2.png) [@elijustrying](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/elijustrying)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 1:42am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/8 "2026-07-30T01:42:33Z")
Ah so you were basically recording votes for good candidates and not recording ( or at least rarely recording) ones that would be rejectable. I take it you know understand that a skip does not serve as a substitute for reject. Are you aware of the advice that to ensure something is being recorded as a vote towards rejection you need to 👎 on one of the first 4 questions ---
**Author:** ![thehounds21](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ebca7d/32.png) [@thehounds21](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/thehounds21)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 1:47am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/9 "2026-07-30T01:47:13Z")
Yea I figured it out. I also realized that the idk button works pretty well when I’m confused 😂 ---
**Author:** ![TjoeMi](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/wayfarer/user_avatar/community.wayfarer.scopely.com/tjoemi/32/53015_2.png) [@TjoeMi](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/TjoeMi)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 2:59am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/10 "2026-07-30T02:59:19Z")
> [@thehounds21](#): > > I mainly get churches, trail markers, art work and sports fields/courts. But until recently I was using the skip button as a reject button Skip button is not reject. By doing this, you are pushing more rejection agreement to other person (you still have right to skip) I am just saying that the number is not something to be fixated. Some people might have more rejection agreement if they have more time to throughly review nomination, some other only review easier nomination and skip the rest. Both are fine. It all depends on you yourself as reviewer. At the end of day, you should review based on criteria and not guessing whether general public accept it or no. ---
**Author:** ![salixsorbus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9fc348/32.png) [@salixsorbus](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/u/salixsorbus)\ **Post date:** [July 30, 2026, 9:21am UTC](https://community.wayfarer.scopely.com/t/what-s-a-good-on-nominations-reviewed/115507/11 "2026-07-30T09:21:01Z")
@thehounds21 For comparison, my stats, having stayed in the top bracket almost constantly prior to the recent changes (I only dropped when Pokemon Go players started reviewing). Total Nominations Reviewed: 17123 Agreements: Accepted: 3375 Agreements: Rejected: 5408 Agreements: Duplicated: 554 Only around 50% agreements and I suspect I am harsher than most reviewers, but I’m not going to change my reviewing habits just to get more agreements. I skip things where I cannot be confident enough about them, but don’t feel the need to reject (e.g., things without streetview that might be there).