Why is this abuse?

Nomination Support
1

Please provide:

  • A screenshot of your nomination, including rejection reasons if it has already been rejected
  • Include the title, description, both photos, and supplemental information
  • Copy and paste the title, description and supplemental so others can translate them
  • If you feel comfortable please share the location, as it is helpful (i.e. hidden duplicates), but you can mask it if you wish.
    Screenshot_20240603_113714_Samsung Internet
    Screenshot_20240603_113714_Samsung Internet1080×2408 141 KB
2

Can you tell us about this place? What is it? What is it used for? Can you share what you wrote about it?

3

Screenshot_20240603_120506_Samsung Internet
Screenshot_20240603_120506_Samsung Internet1080×2408 142 KB

Screenshot_20240603_120517_Samsung Internet
Screenshot_20240603_120517_Samsung Internet1080×2408 189 KB

Screenshot_20240603_120543_Samsung Internet
Screenshot_20240603_120543_Samsung Internet1080×2408 185 KB

4

Welcome @FenixGhost23
A telecom tower is not something that would meet eligibility criteria.
It is not a great place to exercise, socialise or explore. It is a piece of utility equipment.
I wouldn’t consider submitting something not eligible as worth reporting. Was there anything else about your submission that may of triggered that in the text or location?

5

Thank you for letting me know. I live in a rural town that has like 800 to a 1000 people living there with not many interesting poi’s or structures. I will be more careful witb my submissions in the feature if I do find something else

6

Although I think it is a little over the top, perhaps someone reported it as a fake nomination, given your description of it as a historic tower. It might be older, relative to some things, but historic is a description that requires some substantial evidence as to its importance.

7

Brah ek sukkel ook om dit reg te kry. Don’t Stress my dude dit vat tyd om te leer

8

Baie dankie vir die positive respond bra :slight_smile: