This is a letter from the Churches priest commemorating the city’s 100 year anniversary. Hand written, signed and enamoured also framed all visible details from the photo.
I would get it but be a bit annoyed if they said my reflection was visible as there isn’t really a way to get a decent photo without a reflection or it being too angled without a polarising filter. But denying it for it being in a gin/liquor store or being not permanent or distinct is a bit ridiculous.
I don’t get it if I upgrade my submissions or appeal they get accepted but if I do it all natural they get all denied for being adult services, non permanent, private location or schools. Do they not have detectors for if you deny too much, two people shouldn’t have this much power over reviews in the Nordic region.
I would reject this photo since you’re very visible in the reflection
Personally I would not reject for such a reflection, I don’t believe anybody is identifiable in this (though my eyes are very old 
)
Who states this is down to 2 people? Scopely do not state how many reviews are required to make a decision but it’s extremely unlikely to be 2!!!
What happens if a reviewer gets a queue of bad nominations, it’s not Denying too much it’s correctly denying.
Again, Scopely do not discuss their processes but it is likely that the system looks for “patterns”. If a group of reviewers constantly vote Accept where the majority of other reviewers Reject (or vice versa) this should trigger an investigation.
Who are these two sorcerers?
