Support all players equal

Hello Niantic / Wayfarer Team,

I’m writing as a Pokémon GO player who has been playing on and off since 2016. I’ve stuck with the game for years because I genuinely enjoy it, and I continue to invest my time and money into it.

My concern is the experience for players like me who live in rural township areas.

Where I live, there are very few eligible Wayspots, PokéStops, Gyms, Routes, or other locations that support normal Pokémon GO gameplay. That creates a disadvantage that has very little to do with how much effort I put into the game.

A player living in a city or dense suburb may be able to walk outside—or sometimes simply stay home—and have access to several PokéStops, Gyms, raids, research tasks, Routes, item replenishment, showcases, and event opportunities.

Meanwhile, rural players can spend the same money, participate in the same events, and put in the same effort while having dramatically less access to the infrastructure the game is built around.

I want to be clear: I am not asking Niantic to ignore safety rules, private-property restrictions, or Wayspot eligibility requirements.

I understand why those rules exist, and I want to work within them.

What I am asking is whether Niantic has considered providing additional legitimate options for areas where traditional Wayspot eligibility leaves players with almost nothing.

For example, could there eventually be:

  • Additional consideration for underserved rural areas
  • New nomination categories designed specifically for rural communities
  • Community-based Wayspot programs
  • Greater flexibility for safe, permanent community gathering features
  • Alternative methods of providing basic gameplay infrastructure where Wayspot density is extremely low
  • A process where longtime players can request review of severely underserved areas

I believe the issue is bigger than wanting a convenient PokéStop.

It is about whether players in rural communities are being given a reasonable opportunity to participate in the same game.

I have the same access to paid tickets, PokéCoins, raid passes, storage upgrades, event purchases, and other paid features as everyone else. However, geography can substantially limit my ability to benefit from many of the systems those purchases support.

I’m willing to walk, explore, nominate legitimate locations, participate in Wayfarer, and put effort into improving my local Pokémon GO community.

What becomes frustrating is feeling like there may simply be no legitimate path available because of where I happen to live.

After nearly a decade with Pokémon GO, I would really appreciate more than a standard response explaining Wayspot rules. I’m hoping someone can address the larger question:

What legitimate options does a rural player have when their surrounding area simply does not contain enough eligible locations to support the game properly?

And if there currently is no solution, I hope Niantic will seriously consider creating one.

Rural players love Pokémon GO too. We want to explore, raid, participate in events, build our collections, compete, and be part of the community. We just need a fair opportunity to do it.

Thank you for taking the time to read this and for considering the experience of players in areas like mine.

Ken
Longtime Pokémon GO Player

Welcome. Unfortunately wayfarer cant help you if there is nothing to submit. Wayfarer are supposed to reflect real world object in real location so it cant create wayspot if there is nothing. Wayfarer can help you if you need help locating eligible wayspot nearby or if you need advise in submitting. Pokemon Go however have new program called campsite where it allowed local community ambassdor to setup pokestop/gym/ powerspot in public area (usually park or mall). It still require certain number of member in community so you might need to work together with local players in wider area. But for long term, you might want to look into both route simultinously

Welcome to the forum.

I wanted to address this. When I see the word “categories,” I like to make clear that the categories you are asked to choose from when submitting from Pokemon Go have nothing to do with eligibility. In fact, many things listed there are strictly not eligible, like elementary schools. If you use the Web Submit option, there is no categories question. These are just data points.

Second, what points of interest did you have in mind that should be accepted in rural areas that wouldn’t be acceptable elsewhere? There is no list of things to accept. Just the criteria of a great place for exercise, exploration, or being social.

I am curious if you review nominations? It can give you great ideas to see what others have submitted. There is a topic here with a lot of ideas: Tips for Rural Nominators

You may want to have a look at this post:

There are also trials to place wayspots that would not meet criteria and should be Rejected if nominated by Wayfarers.

Once the Trial ends I assume they will make a decision on whether to roll it out to others and how to identify places to do it so they are looking at ways to make it easier to play in certain areas so you will need to be patient and hope it comes to you eventually.

I don’t personally have a “home stop / gym” and I can do a 1 mile exercise walk and only pass 4 wayspots. This is the way I like it. I started playing PoGo to get me out and it has worked. I can also drive to the local town park to join in with Raid Days etc.

I do feel for the “Wayspot Deserts” but would hate to be in the middle of a city where there is no reason for me to go out to play PoGo when I can play sat on the couch. There has to be a sweet spot and this will be different for everyone.

Good Luck

Hey @iBlessed304 ,

Welcome to the Wayfarer Community Forum.

Thank you for reaching out and sharing this feedback. We completely understand the issue you have highlighted. As a longtime player who has invested nearly a decade into Pokémon GO, it is completely understandable to feel frustrated when Wayspot density limits your ability to fully enjoy the game.

Please know that we value and treat all our players equally, regardless of where they live or play. Ensuring that players in rural and underserved areas have a fair, fun experience is an important focus for us, and we are constantly working to improve wayspot availability globally.

We have taken active steps to enhance playability in areas with lower Wayspot density. You can read more about some of our recent efforts here:

While these initiatives are part of our broader efforts to address low-density areas, we’d also love to help you locally. If you are comfortable, please share the general location coordinates of your area (making sure to remove any personally identifiable information, such as your exact home address). Our community can take a look at the area and help you identify potential Wayspots that fit the Wayfarer criteria for submission.

Thank you again for your passion, dedication, and patience over the years. We truly appreciate you being a part of the Pokémon GO community!

Best,

Thank you for explaining the categories part. I actually misunderstood what role those played in eligibility, so that clarification helps.

I don’t necessarily think rural communities should have completely different or lower eligibility standards. What I’m trying to get at is whether there could be more recognition or guidance for locations that serve the same purpose in rural communities but don’t necessarily have the infrastructure you see in more populated areas.For example, rural gathering areas, community spaces, locally significant landmarks, public access areas, trails or recreation locations, and other places residents actually use to socialize, exercise, or explore may not always have a sign, plaque, pavilion, or other obvious object that makes for an easy Wayspot nomination.

That’s really the problem I’m trying to solve: not lowering the standard because an area is rural, but finding ways for legitimate rural points of interest to be better represented while still meeting the goals of exploration, exercise, and socialization.I haven’t done much reviewing yet, so I’ll definitely take a look at the rural nomination examples you mentioned. I think that could also help me better understand what is already possible under the current criteria versus where there may actually be room for improvement.

I appreciate you taking the time to explain this and ask the question.

Feel free to post any of these you are having trouble with getting accepted in Nomination Support to workshop. One at a time works best.

There are ways of illustrating some of these other than a single traditional sign.

Now that we can submit via the web we have the option to attach 5 images to support the nomination. 1 or 2 are likely to be the ones showing the location in its surroundings to help verify where it is. That leaves scope for screenshots from webpages ( link in supplementary text) pictures that show people gathering, pictures of rooms set up for an event. You can explain further in supplementary text but you can now present a richer visual picture. Think creatively :smiling_face_with_sunglasses:

Thank you, I really appreciate the offer! I’m at work right now, but when I get off I’ll take a look around and put together one of the examples I’ve been thinking about. I’ll post it in Nomination Support and would definitely appreciate your help working through it with me.

I’m interested to see what might already be possible under the current criteria, especially for some of these rural locations. Thanks again for being willing to help!

Hey Cyndie, I finally got the pictures of one of the examples I was thinking about.

This is a large, permanent multi-compartment birdhouse/wildlife structure mounted on its own pole. It’s located at the very front of my roughly 2-acre residential property, near the road.

I understand that private residential property may ultimately make this particular example ineligible, but since you offered to help me workshop some rural examples, I figured I’d start here and be completely transparent about the location.

From an exploration/nature standpoint, is there any case for something like this under the current criteria? And if the residential location automatically disqualifies this one, would an identical structure on public or community land potentially qualify?

I’m mainly trying to better understand where the line is so I can identify stronger rural candidates going forward. I appreciate you taking the time to help!

(attachments)


Yes, being on your private residential property is a non-starter, so this would not be eligible.

Birdhouses in general are not something that are an easy accept. Normally people are encouraged to stay away from them so as not to discourage the birds from using them. However, very distinctive ones sometimes get accepted, and if one has information posted, that can be accepted. Or possibly a viewing area (bench, etc.) for watching the bird house. But again, that would have to be on property that is not private residential.

Okay Cyndie, I have another rural example/question for you :joy:

I understand now that my private residential property is the biggest issue with the birdhouse, even though it’s near the road.

What about something like a very distinctive/custom mailbox at the roadside?

Or, here’s a more unusual idea: what if I built a permanent physical Pokémon GO-themed “PokéStop” structure specifically for local Pokémon GO players and placed it at the very edge of my property by the road? I’m picturing something recognizable and well-made that could potentially become a little point of interest for players passing through the area.

I realize it’s still associated with my residential property, so I’m guessing the private-property rule may immediately disqualify it too. But I’m curious whether creating something specifically intended as a community/social point of interest changes anything, or whether anything located on the residential parcel is automatically ineligible regardless of its purpose or roadside accessibility.

I’m enjoying learning where all these lines are, so thank you for continuing to entertain my rural ideas!

Again, if it is on the private residential property, it is ineligible. A good example would be the clarifications on Little Free Libraries. They are meant for the community to use, but the ones on single family private residential are ineligible. A mailbox is also usually on private residential property in these kinds of areas. One that is particularly artistic might be eligible if the location is a common area for the community, but these would normally be mailboxes for businesses.

Gotcha — the Little Free Library example actually makes the PRP rule much clearer to me. I understand what you’re saying now, and I promise I’ll stop trying to resurrect my front yard :joy:

Thank you for taking the time to answer all of my questions and work through these examples with me. I really do appreciate it. I’m just determined to better understand what opportunities rural players have under the current criteria.

Before I go hunting for my next example, could I flip the question around?

If you were in a very rural area with few existing Wayspots, what is one hypothetical example you would see and think, “Yep, that’s a strong nomination,” assuming it was safely accessible and not on private residential property?

I’d love to have an example of what you personally consider a strong rural candidate so I know what to keep my eyes open for.

Keep in mind that I’m from Germany so this might not perfectly apply for you but:

  • Sports areas like basketball courts, football/soccer fields etc
  • Churches
  • Crosses
  • Picnic areas
  • Playgrounds
  • Info points

I know Cyndie posted it before already, but consider checking this post again,: Tips for Rural Nominators

Also I have made some tools that can scan map data for spots to explore and check out for eligible wayspots: Why does Niantic hate rural players? - #10 by GabrielPBC
Maybe this can help you.

I am not often in a truly rural area. I think @niktero may be able to make suggestions on that.

Personally, I would be checking every single location that is not private residential or farmland for anything significant. Like the crossroads gas station may have a picnic area. Or the local grocery store could have a mural.

The best thing in seriously rural areas is to start a deep dive into your very local history. What happened here 100 + years ago? Are there old mines? Localy significant industry? Battlefields? Are there defunct (or active) railroad lines? This often means there might be USGS geo markers if you are in the USA. Same with highways. USGS did most of its mapping markers after the 1930s so anything planned after that is a good bet. NGS Survey Map | National Geodetic Survey

As for local community areas, they are still eligible same as a fancy city park but since they are less obvious that means a really good photo and a really good explanation are needed. Act as if you are explaining to a young child’s parents why this is a good place to be (exercise/ explore/ socialize) and why even though there are no sidewalks, this is a safe place to walk. Remember most of the people reviewing will have never imagined how this kind of community actually works and have no experience.

The local cemetery is not something we usually suggest for waypoints but in rural areas there can be some very interesting people there. Always check the oldest and I go by the 50 + year rule before even researching. Find one that died so long ago (50+yrs) that no children, parents, or close family still comes to morn. Then look up thier life and if they were famous enough for a wiki page then you may be in luck. The main thing in cemeteries is to remember we want to be considerate of other people who are here often on their worst day and be respectful where we play games. This means historic cemeteries that are not active are the best.

The very hardest place for waypoints in rural USA is farm country particularly east of the Mississippi. The lack of USFS, BLM, and other public land systems also means a lack of trails and outdoor recreation opportunities that really help rural west get pokestops.

I could have been more elaborate with my supporting info but this whole region is rural so most of my reviewers understand.

These took a couple tries and honestly might have been better with summer photos. The snow at least shows how popular this walking route is. It was the fine print on this sign that showed it was put up by a local neighborhood association and parks department that pushed this over the edge from generic public safety infrastructure to an identifiable trail sign.

This is great advice! I found out that we have a local history club/historical society (translation ftw), and that made me find out a lot about my town & helped me with a lot of submissions.

Hi, I have a question regarding how Wayfarer determines whether a residential property is considered single-family or multi-family.

For example, if one residential structure contains two independently occupied portions under separate agreements, what documentation or property characteristics does Wayfarer use to determine whether the property falls under the single-family private residential property exclusion?

Is this determination based on zoning, separate addresses, separate entrances or living spaces, ownership/lease agreements, actual occupancy, or another standard?

I’m mainly looking for clarification on how Wayfarer defines the distinction between single-family and multi-family residential property when reviewing Wayspot nominations.