Please provide:
Its already declare as loccated at Parking spot at the back of the hospital
secondly, how on earth is you considered a 40+ years old water tank a non-permanent object
In appropriate reasoning to everyone who decided to use that as a reason.
Submission for re-review
why does everything that GPS told in hospital got decline,
it’s not even accurate, it’s actually in other area far from "มูลนิธิน้อมเกล้า“
this algorithm or AI judgement needs to go, man
my previous submission, water fountain, pavillion also turned down
just because its say obstruct emergency?
can you explain to me how? on earth!
that a fountain obstruct emergency, how a resting area like pavillion obstruct emergency
or is it just a algorithm that always get overlook and not update to nowadays norms?!
if it overlooked, its the good time to start giving a good reason and at lease human verified that it got turn downs, and maybe add a form of re-consideration for any given reason.
now the submission criteria, and people who are approving it are just doing a sloppy job and not even follow the old instruction given to us by themselves
Hi. Can you provide full detail on all your nomination? You can find the coordinate in the thank you email that you receive after submission.
Your nomination is rejected by your local community. The full rejection clause also mention “not distinct”, in most case reviewer dont reject it because its not permanent, but because they dont believe its distinct enough to be wayspot. Submission in hospital is always tricky because reviewer may not sure where is the emergency services area. The onus is still on submitter to convince reviewer that your submission wont obstruct emergency access. Try locating where is emergency access and show it to reviewer. If the fountain or pavilion is located near emergency services, it might get rejected
Last , if you disagree with the rejection, you can resubmit with better evidence or appeal. You have 2 appeals, each with 15days cooldown
Hello,
You have raised a similar query recently
I understand the frustration of having rejections and sometimes we need to let that frustration out but can I remind you to be respectful to your fellow wayfinders.
You can write in your own language to help prevent misunderstandings.
In that previous topic the community tried to explain and assist. In particular they explained the situation around hospitals.
A water tower is a basic utility to help ensure a good supply of water. They are often distinctive structures, but it is unusual that they actually meet criteria for eligibility and acceptance.
If a water tower is to be accepted a specific good case will need to be made.
In reviewing your nomination it would appear that several reviewers selected to reject under the question permanent and distinct. This is a confusing combination, and it causes multiple problems especially to the nominators like yourself who receive a rejection reason that is not clear.
They will have ticked this box because as it is a utility item it is not designed to be a distinctive architectural feature but a functional object. They are not commenting on the permanence.
I totally agree this is a confusing message for you to receive as a rejection reason, but I hope you now understand why.
Please take on board the advice that was previously given and ask here first before submission so that we can help you create and draft something that is more likely to succeed.
The rejection reason “not permanent and distinct” comes up in three situations:
* reviewers did not think the object is permanent
* reviewers did not think the object is distinct
* reviewers did not think the object meets any criteria (exercise, explore, social) and wanted to explicitly reject it, so reject for not “permanent and distinct” because that is the advice from Scopely Explore
problem is, man,
all pokestop around here are mostly small shrines, thats private to houses, its common for thailand to have that
I dont understand how distinct it is for a small shrine, compared to a larger shrine, an ancient building, a water towers, in public place, that get turned down
not sure if those so called “local community” wants all the private shrine near their house abd for their abusive use of pokestop ?
recently there are multitudes of duplicate atound my area, and private property stuff that got accept?
how can we look into this matter, and make the stop are in “more public area”
then help me this;
how to submit the exact same water tower and succeed?
you’ll get frustrated by my local community, which cant even be throroughly explore why other private property pokestop got easily accepted?
Some wayspot might got incorrectly approved but it can be reported for removal by anyone who notice it.
I am sorry but for certain area sometimes there just nothing to be submitted. You cant bypass the Single Family Private Residential Property rule because it its tied to real life law suit. Not all private property is ineligible, business and multi family PRP is ok. You can try asking for if someone willing to look around your area (dont give your home address)
Each nomination will be reviewed with its own merit. There no nomination that exactly the same. Rule of thumb is never compare existing nomination to what you want to submit
You can work with your local pogo community ambassador and setup your local campsite where you can propose pokestop/gym at public area (usually park or mall) but this is outside wayfarer scope. Wayfarer have some trial ongoing to help rural players getting some wayspot but its still in development
