If I were reviewing this nomination, I’d probably reject it, as I find breweries like this are often just bars that also serve food. It seems like it’s pretty obvoius to me that they should be classified as “adult location”… but I digress…
Digging into this particular edit, it’s pretty clear to me that someone is attempting to change “Claimstake” into “Mad Fate Brewing” without a proper review process.
Google street-view still shows the “Claimstake” sign out front, however the address on maps-view clearly shows that the name has been changed to “Mad Fate Brewing”.
The website looks like it’s Mad Fate Beer Co., which reflects the new location’s branding.
I feel like most breweries are just bars under a different name for marketing reasons, but I can see the appeal of why one might be nominated/approved… but that’s besides the point. “Mad Fate” needs to be nominated & approved based on it’s own merits, instead of piggybacking on the laurels of “Claimstake”.
Oh lol I was just discussing this earlier today. I had skipped that in review because I couldn’t tell if repurposing was happening here. But it does look like the same owners have closed the Claimstake Brewing tap room and are operating it as Mad Fate
And I forgot to mention that they already got the Title change through fwiw:
And to address the other issue, you can flag the photos since there is no report button on the photo adds, but those reasons I can flag for don’t seem right. Will edit a screenshot next time I get a review. If I determine that it IS repurposing, currently I reject the photo, and then use a separate report form.
None of those say this is an attempt to repurpose to me. So I just reject the photo, and then do a report that the original business has closed with the modification report:
