So i have been getting lots and lots of rejections from the wayfarer nominations. I am trying to hone my skills and get better at it but when i saw this rejection i really can’t understand what am i doing wrong. Originally the rejection was “this is not an unique or historical place” but that rejection has disappeared and it’s only just Rejected. I have no way to appeal because i have been appealing multiple rejections i have gotten for similar places.
The symbol is old enough to be medieval, the place is safe, the trail is explorable and exciting, the pictures are well taken. Like i am close to achieve expert on the nominations and i have seen some places that are quite questionable but let’s say alright, they became Wayspots. But what am i doing wrong? If anyone is cool enough to help me understand
Hi, welcome to the forum.
I did not review this one, but I happened to see a lot of these in my review queue today (in the USA).
I rejected all of them, not that I disagree that they are old, but just not something I consider a great place to explore. The fact that something is old, does not make it a Point of Interest, just makes it more likely.
These kind of markers typically need some luck, some reviewers (like myself) don’t like them, others do, and you need consensus to get them approved.
You can always try again, I’m sure there are plenty of reviewers who would approve.
Welcome to the forum 
Your description is a little meagre. If someone is unsure about whether this is eligible or not, that description is not going to help.
A lot of your supporting text does nothing to support this plaque being eligible as a wayspot. Finding this plaque does not help explore the trail, the city, the mountain or the amazing views. Overstating your case here may also dissuade people from accepting.
In the description, say what this is, what it means, its history, its purpose.
In the supporting text, explain how this object meets criteria
