Invalid wayspot appeal - Saint Ann Park/Red Swing set

[rawwrs]

When submitting a Wayspot Appeal, make sure to include as much of the following information as possible:

• Wayspot Title: Saint Ann Park/Red Swing set
• Location (lat/lon): 38.737476, -90.382398 and 38.738356, -90.382013
• City: St Ann, MO
• Country: USA
• Screenshot of the Rejection Email (do not include your personal information):
• 
• 
• Additional Information (if any): These are both duplicates of St Ann Park Playground, 38.738179, -90.381776
• Both playgrounds are the same playground structure

<—St Ann Park Playground

<— Saint Ann Park

[wooperIooper]

A park and a playground are two entirely different things, I would not consider them duplicates at all.

[Tntnnbltn]

The submission at 38.737476,-90.382398 was for a playground which has since been removed.

This is the original photo which was submitted in 2014, for the playground which no longer exists:

I would say it should be removed because the physical item for the Wayspot (the original playground) was removed, noting that there is already a nearby Wayspot for the park itself (38.737361,-90.381582).

[Tntnnbltn]

As for the Red Swings, they seem like they are in a physically separated area to the playground.

[elijustrying]

In case anyone else looks at the park entrance I have requested the removal of the photo with the child, even although the face is turned away I don’t think it’s appropriate.